beta
대구지방법원 2016.07.27 2016나910

물품대금

Text

1. The part against the plaintiff falling under the following order of payment among the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked:

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with goods of October and KRW 6,485,160 (including surtax; hereinafter the same shall apply) to the Defendant on October 31, 2012.

(3) Although a tax invoice was issued, the Defendant’s revocation of the tax invoice under the name of the Defendant and the Defendant’s revocation of the tax invoice is deemed to be a “Ontex Korea.”

(2) On December 3, 2012, the Plaintiff again issued 6,485,160 won tax invoices (i) to Nexex Korea on the same day. Although the Plaintiff supplied the goods for November to the Defendant, it was demanded on December 11, 2012 to directly issue the 4,714,985 won (ii) to Nex Korea. On February 18, 2013, the Defendant demanded that the said 2 goods should be issued to the Plaintiff on December 18, 2013, and the said 30 tax invoices should be issued to the Plaintiff on December 19, 201, 193, 203, 300 won, 5,000 won, 5,000 won, 5,000 won, 196,000 won, 5,000 won, 5,000 won, 196,000 won, 196,013,000 won, respectively.