However, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving the Internet as if it were to sell things in a planned manner by using the anonymousness of the Internet, and by deceiving the proceeds therefrom, and is not good for the crime, such as undermining the order of goods in the Internet space based on credit, and the defendant has been subject to criminal punishment several times including the suspension of the execution of imprisonment for the same kind of crime, and even after the crime of this case, the defendant was punished by a fine by committing the same kind of crime against another victim, and no agreement has been reached between the victim and the victim until the court below. Considering the various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character, character, family relation, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

2. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.