A. Defendant A: 5% per annum from April 9, 2015 to March 10, 2016; and 5% per annum from March 10, 2016. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 27080, Mar. 1, 2016>

A. Defendant B borrowed a rocketing car (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) from Garenk Company, and Defendant A driven the Defendant vehicle on June 21, 2013, at around 01:01, the 140.8 km away from the coast guard line of the west Highway at the Hamsan-si, Gunsan-si.

There are two lanes, and the defendant's vehicle is moving into two lanes depending on one lane, and the balance is lost, the central separation zone is shocked, and the central separation zone has stopped in one lane.

(B) from the following, the primary accident of this case is referred to as “the primary accident of this case.”

As such, D, a driving day of the Defendants, stops in the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle with E Belgium that was driven by the Defendants, and took place at the same time as F, which was loaded to kill the instant primary accident.

At the time, D only used the emergency lights of the car of the Belgium, but did not take measures such as installing a sign so that the driver from the behind can be informed of the accident in advance.

C. In several minutes, G driving a cargo vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff vehicle”) as H T and driving at one lane, and the Defendant vehicle and the Belgium car in front are not seen in advance, and thereafter, at the latest, it was received the rear portion of the Plaintiff’s car as the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

The car of the Belgium, which had been pushed ahead of it, was faced with the Defendant’s vehicle that had not been absent by the Defendant A.

After that, the plaintiff's vehicle was spared on the right side, and the I K3 vehicle was re-issued on the side side.

From the next day (hereinafter “the second accident”). D.

Due to the instant 1 and 2 accidents, F died, and D, Defendants, K, L, and M on board K3, and Defendant vehicle, Belgium car, Belgium car, K3 car, and the central separation cost of road was damaged.

E. The Plaintiff, as the insurer of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, was the instant 1 and 2 until April 8, 2015.