2. The defendant, on the ground that the victims' daily conduct had found a new accident that was lost to the defendant's daily conduct, committed the injury requiring two-day medical treatment, and the injury requiring 90-day medical treatment to the victim E respectively. The result of the crime in this case is significant, the crime in this case is not less complicated, the defendant has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, the fact that the defendant deposited KRW 8.5 million for the victim E is already considered in the court below, and there is no special circumstance or change of circumstances that can be considered for sentencing newly after the decision of the court below, and the sentencing of the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, the circumstances of the crime, and the result of the crime in this case, etc. are considered to be contrary to the defendant and there is a family member to be supported, and the punishment of the court below shall not be deemed to be unfair even if it is considered that there is a family member to be supported.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.