2. The circumstance is that the judgment of the defendant is against all the crime of this case; the defendant's photograph taken by the defendant on the Internet does not go beyond spreading, etc. a woman's photograph taken by a camera on the Internet; the victim of the crime of this case is agreed upon by some of the victims; and the defendant seems to be suffering from mental disorder requiring medical treatment despite not being judged as a state of legal mental disorder.

However, in light of the motive, circumstance, method, etc. of the crime, such as taking the body of a large number of women for a planned short period of time, certain crimes were attempted to take the personal situation of victims, and the motive, circumstance, method, etc. of the crime, such as purchasing the sex of a number of women under the name of the victims, and the defendant was punished by a fine or imprisonment with prison labor in the previous case, as well as the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor in the Seoul Central District Court on February 25, 201 with prison labor for the same kind and six years at the Seoul Central District Court on February 25, 2011, and committed the crime of this case in the same way as a repeated crime for which one half year has not passed without any reflection after the execution of the sentence was completed, and the court below appears to have taken into account all the favorable circumstances, and there seems to be any change in circumstances that would have occurred in the trial, and it seems appropriate to take into account the motive, motive, consequence, etc. of the defendant's environment, motive, and circumstances.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.