Around April 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) in the official space next to the management office in the C Apartment-si, the Defendant: (b) did not lend KRW 8 million to the Association by the victim D, the president of the CHousing Reconstruction Project Association, and received KRW 6,289,000 as an interest to the Association; (c) did so so so; (d) the Defendant refers to the victim’s executive officer so that it can be seen by an unspecified large number of residents; (b) he borrowed KRW 8,289,00 to the Promotion Committee and deposited KRW 6,289,00 as an individual head of the association. The executive officer of the association filed a complaint with the National Assembly against the said fact to the Public Prosecutor; and (d) the executive officer of the association did not know that he/she had notified the National Assembly members of the said fact. He/she did not know that he/she had been able to observe the property of Korea by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out the banner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of crime scene;

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) (one day: 100,00 won) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Suspension of sentence: Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (a fine not exceeding one million won for a suspended sentence);

1. The reason for sentencing lies in the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant is deemed to have led to the confession of the instant crime and to not repeat the same kind of crime; (b) the Defendant has received a non-prosecution disposition with the similar content from the prosecution; (c) the Defendant has no record of having been punished for the same kind of crime; and (d) the circumstances leading to the instant crime.