beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.11.26 2012고합1356

변호사법위반등

Text

Defendant

A In four years of imprisonment, the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, Paragraph 1 of Article 2012 Gohap1450 decided on Defendant B, and fraud.

Reasons

Defendant 12 Gohap1356, Defendant 12 Gohap1450, guilty of violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, which has been given and received KRW 30 million from non-title U for permission for a charnel house, under the name of the summary of the case number of the judgment summary.

1. To acquire by fraud of KRW 16.5 million, 40 million, from office Lane C in the name of the prosecution;

2. Fraudation of 19,400,000 won from officero C in the name of the prosecution;

3. Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act (Defendant B’s sole criminal act), fraud A, and part of the conviction (guilty in the case of paragraphs (1) and (3), not guilty in the case of paragraphs (2), (1) 1 and (6.5 million won), not guilty in the case of paragraph (1) 40 million won), which is not an attorney-at-law, 127 million won from V as a security for the 13th classical 439 salary document (not guilty in the case of February 28, 2007) and 1.2 billion won from V, respectively (Fraud in the case of September 18, 2007), and violation of the Special Act by fraud (Fraud), A, C, guilty in the case of 13 high-class 447 million won;

1. V requires V to perform landscaping works, and the payment of the construction cost of KRW 920 million shall be two million;

2. He found the defendant guilty of 3,068,650,111 W and X guilty of 200,000,000 won by taking into account the security of the 3,068,650,111 capital (Fraud) C guilty of 13,458,00 won and 13,50,000 won and 13,050,000 won and 5,000,000 won and 13,050,000 won and 8,000,000 won and 3,000,000 won and 13,05,00 won and 5,000 won and 13,00,000 won and 3,000,00 won and 13,754,000,000 won and 3,000,000 won and 3,000,00 won and 13,54,000.

1. Intrusion into a charnel building jointly possessed by the accomplices AC, etc.;

2. On April 28, 201, Defendant B convicted AC of violation of the Act on the Control of Exposure (Joint Residence) and violation of the Act on the Control of Exposure (Joint Injury) (Joint Injury) in collaboration with accomplices (criminal record) and Defendant B of the crime of occupational embezzlement in the Seoul Southern Southern District Court (hereinafter “Seoul Southern District Court”) is sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for eight months.

참조조문