On July 3, 2017, around 15:05, the Defendant:E (E) operated by the victim DD in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Sungnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 3, 2017, used a gap in the victim’s surveillance neglected surveillance in the mutual clothes store, and used the gap in the victim’s market value, which is the victim’s ownership, and stolen the Defendant, by putting it in the shopping bags that prepared 20,000 won in advance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A simplified statement of D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. There is no person who does not have any special sentencing [decision of sentencing] in the basic area (from June to one year and six months] (the decision of sentencing] under Article 329 of the applicable law on criminal facts, Article 329 of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, the reason for sentencing of imprisonment [the scope of recommendation] of the punishment of general property (the scope of general larceny] (the decision of sentencing is against the defendant], and there are favorable circumstances such as the recovery of damaged things, but the defendant has a record of the same kind of crime more than 10 times, and the defendant has been punished with a fine, and all of them have been punished with a penalty as ordered, taking into account all the circumstances of sentencing indicated in the records, such as the fact that the defendant has committed a repeated crime.