Where the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

On September 27, 2011, the Defendant embezzled the said vehicle by refusing the return of the said vehicle without justifiable grounds, even though the Defendant was requested from the victim on December 15, 2013 to terminate the lease contract and to return the said vehicle on March 11, 2014, while entering into a lease agreement on the condition that the Plaintiff would pay KRW 1,501,200 every month rent for 48 months at the point of the mid-to Incheon metropolitan area located in Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 355 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing reasons of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) shall be taken into consideration the circumstances leading to the crime of this case by the defendant, the fact that the defendant returned the vehicle to the victim and the victim did not want the punishment of the defendant,