beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2018.04.10 2017가단10898

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The defendant is based on the restoration of the true name with respect to the land size of 172 square meters in Chungcheongnam-gun, Ulsan-gun, Chungcheongnam-do.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. C completed the registration of ownership transfer on June 12, 1937 with respect to the 52 square meters (the 52 square meters was changed to 172 square meters in a unit of size on October 18, 1999; hereinafter “instant land”) in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun on June 17, 1937.

C’s address is “Suljin-gun D”.

B. On September 16, 1983, the Ulsan District Court (Seoul District Court No. 6330 on September 16, 1983), pursuant to the former Act on Special Measures for the Registration, etc. of Ownership of Real Estate (Act No. 3562, invalidation, and invalidation (hereinafter “Special Measures Act”), the registration of ownership transfer under the name of E, the husband of the defendant, was completed on the ground of sale as of May 10, 1969.

C. On April 7, 2009, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer under the name of the Defendant, which was based on inheritance due to the agreement division as of November 3, 2008, the receipt of the Ulsan District Court’s Ulsan District Court’s receipt of the Ulsan District Court’s receipt of the Ulsan District Court’s receipt.

E owned and occupied a building on the ground of this case from around November 3, 2008 to around November 3, 2008, which was the date of the death of E. The Defendant began to reside in the above building with E around 1968, and has occupied it while residing in the above building on the ground of this case until now.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4 through 7, and 10 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. In full view of whether C is a Japanese person or not, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings, it is reasonable to deem C to be a Japanese person in light of the following: (a) the head of Nowon-gu, U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S.F., “C has no certified transcript;” and (b) the head of U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.C., if C is a creative Korean person, it appears that there is no certified

(b)in this case;