, however, for two years from the date this judgment has become final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle QM5 vehicle.

On December 2, 2019, the Defendant driven the above car on December 17:45, 2019, and proceeded at a speed of about 92 km as the speed of speed from the Gu road to the Gu road, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun.

At the time, it was difficult to secure the view due to damage and street lights, and it is a neighboring road to the village and the restricted speed is 50 km per hour. Therefore, a person engaged in driving service is obliged to observe the restricted speed, to thoroughly conduct the front-round vision, and to prevent accidents in advance.

그럼에도 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 제한속도를 약 42km 초과하여 진행한 과실로 피고인의 전방에서 같은 방향으로 진행하던 피해자 E(남, 70세)이 탑승한 보행보조용 의자차의 뒷부분을 위 승용차 앞부분으로 충격하였고, 피해자로 하여금 위 보행보조용 의자차와 함께 전방 14m 앞으로 튕겨 낙하하게 하여, 이후 같은 방향에서 진행해오던 B가 운전하는 F SM6 승용차로 하여금 피해자를 깔고 지나가도록 하였다.

As a result, the Defendant shared with the above occupational negligence and caused the victim to die due to a dives damage, such as chest and pelvis damage, etc. in the same place.

2. Defendant B is a person engaging in driving a FST6 car.

On December 2, 2019, the Defendant driven the above car on December 17:50, 2019, and proceeded at a speed of about 64 km in the city of Si/Gu as an old-dong intersection from the area of miscarriage distance to the area of Gu-dong intersection.

At the time, it was difficult to secure the view due to the occurrence of the disaster and the street lamps, and there was a limit of 50km per hour around the village, and the victim E was used on the road due to the accident caused by the above A, so the person engaging in driving service is complying with the speed limit and is able to take the front place.