However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 25, 2011, the Defendant requested D (the issuance of a summary order in fraud on October 21, 2016) to request D (the issuance of a summary order in fraud on October 21, 2016) to make a false report on the victim's Korean-Japan Non-Life Insurance Co., Ltd. as if the accident occurred while driving a re-scheduled vehicle without a driver's license and causing a traffic accident.

Accordingly, around January 25, 201, D calls to the staff in charge of the victim's company on January 25, 201, and "A was involved in a traffic accident while driving C again in the vicinity of F school located in the Chungcheongnambuk-gun E around January 25, 2011.

“The insurance money was claimed when making a false statement.”

However, in fact, the person who drives the above C in the vicinity of the EF school of the Chungcheongbuk-gun in the above day was not D but the defendant.

The Defendant and D conspired, as seen above, received KRW 47,300,000 as insurance money from the victim by deceiving the victim, and then transferred to the victim through the account in the name of D around March 18, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the letter of confirmation (Evidence No. 23), on-site photographs, photographs of accident vehicles, and insurance proceeds;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasoning for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that not only the relevant fraud victim but also the overall insurance subscribers’ insurance premium increase according to the principle of non-life insurance but also the damage inflicted on the whole society, and thus, the crime of this case is not very good.

In addition, the defendant has been punished as a crime of fraud.

However, the fact that one's mistake is divided and reflected, that one's agreement is reached with the victim, and the defendant's age and sex are committed.