Seized evidence 4 or 6 shall be forfeited from the criminal defendant.

At the time of October 12, 1999, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul District Court, and on October 27, 201, the Seoul Southern District Court sentenced one year and two months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence on August 7, 2012.

Around May 2014, the Defendant, along with a single-person “D”, took first, followed up the so-called “humping” in a short fashion with the word “D,” followed the Defendant’s attempt to steals money and goods, and prepared for the commission of crimes, such as armoreds, durgs, etc.

On June 9, 2014, at around 20:09, the Defendant and D confirmed that the Defendant had no person in front of the house F of the victim F of the Dongjak-gu Seoul E apartment 14th floor in Dongjak-gu, Seoul, and confirmed that the Defendant had no person in front of the house, and thereafter, D removed a locker device attached to the suspender with the date he was prepared, and found the locker into the house, and then cut off the locker into the house, and the Defendant cut off the 14k female neck, which is the victim in a small room, with a precious metal amounting to 3 million won in total, such as 2, 14k female Bags and 14k female female macks.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen the victim's property together with D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Investigation report (in-depth CCTV verification investigation), investigation report (in-depth CCTV in the victim's residence), investigation report (in-depth investigation into CCTV in the victim's residence), investigation report (in-depth search and seizure of the suspect's residence);

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. Photographss of seized articles, the scene of their occurrence, and the photograph of criminal tools;

1. Previous records: Criminal records, etc. inquiry reports and the current status of personal identification and confinement;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, method of crime, and the fact that the crime of this case was committed systematically and systematically;

1. Criminal facts;