A and B shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

The Defendants respectively.

[2015 High Court Decision 135]

1. No owner or user of a private-use truck shall provide or lease such private-use truck commercially for transport purposes;

Nevertheless, the defendant from May 22, 2014 to the same year.

6.3. For up to 1.3., G going out to the F market candidate of the “6.4 Nationwide Local Election” was lent the H 1 ton of H 1 ton of cargo owned by the Defendant, subject to KRW 1.3 million.

2. The owner or user of a private-use truck for defendant A shall not provide or lease such private-use truck commercially for transport purposes;

Nevertheless, the defendant from May 22, 2014 to the same year.

6.3. For up to 1.3., for '6.4 Nationwide Local Election', K has leased 1.3 million won and n1 ton of freight vehicles owned by the Defendant to K, and n1 ton of freight vehicles to L, respectively, on the condition that K is granted 1.3 million won and 1.378 thousand won to J-do council members.

3. No owner or user of a private-use truck shall provide or lease such private-use truck commercially for transport purposes;

Nevertheless, the defendant from May 22, 2014 to the same year.

6.3. For up to 1.3., the P 1 ton of the P 1 ton of the Defendant’s vehicle was lent to the P O that was sent to the candidate for the J superintendent of education of the '6.4 Nationwide Local Election'.

[2015 Height188] Defendant B is the owner of a private truck for Quter II.

In spite of the fact that the owner or user of a private-use truck is prohibited from leasing the private-use truck for a fee, the Defendant, using a consignment company around May 22, 2014, leased the private-use truck with a rent of KRW 1,300,000,000 to theO for an election tax until June 3, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 High Court Decision 135]

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. 64 local elections;