However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. On April 29, 2019, the injured Defendant: (a) at C main points located in Seocho-si B on April 19, 2019; (b) after drinking the victim D(47 years of age) and drinking alcohol, the injured Defendant paid the victim the alcohol value; (c) however, on the ground that the victim did not have the remaining alcohol value due to lack of money, he/she made the victim go to himself/herself, when he/she takes the face of the victim one time; (d) he/she pushed the victim into his/her left hand by cutting the victim's timber out of the main point; (e) when he/she takes the face of the victim out of the main point and drinking; (e) when he/she takes the victim's hair, she faced the victim with his/her hair column with his/her hair, and (e) took the victim's body over the victim's body by taking the victim's back his/her body to the left part by taking the victim's body as fast as necessary for treatment, etc.

2. A special intimidation: (a) the Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing Paragraph (1) above, abused the victim, and laid down the bricks (190x90x60m) that are dangerous objects on the road, and (b) threatened the victim by carrying dangerous objects, intending to get the victim into force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Photographs, on-site verification photographs, two photographs, investigation reports (F relative investigation of a witness), investigation reports (party investigation of a witness G);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act that prescribes the penalty (the point of injury), Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant's erroneous reasoning for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is recognized, and the defendant agrees with the victim.