도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. Violation of the Road Traffic Act;
A. At around 18:50 on December 14, 2019, the Defendant driven B dump II dump truck with a blood alcohol content of about 10km from the 10km section to the road on which it is impossible to identify the trade name located in the territorial area of Si/Gun, Si/Gun. From the front day of the restaurant where it is impossible to find out the trade name in the territorial area of Si/Gun, Si/Gun.
B. On December 15, 2019, at around 17:47, the Defendant driven the cargo vehicles of the foregoing paragraph (a) while under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.120% from the section of approximately 2.8km to the roads of the same military area via the 1138-lane intersection from the roads in front of the Republic of Korea, Sinnam-gun, Sinnam-gun, and the same military site.
Accordingly, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle, etc. at least twice while under the influence of alcohol.
2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Adverse Measures) The Defendant is a person engaged in driving B B dump trucks.
On December 15, 2019, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol of 0.120% with a blood alcohol concentration of 17:47, and led to the running of the above cargo at a level of 0.120%, 1138-ro 2, 1138-side intersections on the site of Sinnam-gun, Sinnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun, to the face
At the time, there was a place around it at night, so a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to look at the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to prevent the accident.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, and was found to have a shock absorption unit installed on the right side of the intersection of the site as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence as seen above, destroyed the 9,032,718 Won for repair costs, and did not immediately stop the site and did not take necessary measures, and escaped.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. The circumstantial statements of each host driver, respectively.