If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

The Defendant had to obtain approval from the competent administrative agency when he/she intends to change the ownership route of the vehicle B, the structure, devices, etc. of the vehicle. However, around December 2012, the Defendant changed the structure by voluntarily removing the cargo partition wall installed inside the vehicle from size divers and installing the e-lease.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the notification of detection Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 81 subparagraph 19 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act concerning facts constituting an offense. Article 81 (Selection of Punishment of Fines)

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order (the reason for the punishment: the defendant argued that the structure was modified to board a grandchild who is a disabled person, but according to the police interrogation protocol against the defendant, the above vehicle can be recognized as changing the structure for the rest of the defendant with the vehicle mixed with the vehicle mixed with the defendant).