임금 등
1. The defendant shall select the parties to the plaintiff (appointed parties) and the selectors listed in the annexed list No. 1 and the annexed list No. 2.
1. Basic facts
A. The parties concerned are companies running passenger transportation business, etc., and the plaintiffs (appointed parties; hereinafter referred to as the "Plaintiffs, etc.") and the designated parties listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiffs, etc.") are the workers belonging to the defendant who joined the National Public Transport and Social Services Workers' Union (former National Transport and Social Workers' Union; hereinafter referred to as the "Labor Union of this case") affiliated with the National Democratic Trade Union Federation of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the "National Workers' Union of this case").
B. Collective bargaining and industrial action from around 2010; 1) Jeollabuk-do is an industrial union consisting of workers engaged in the land transport business or any incidental business related thereto from before the union of this case, and is affiliated with the Korean Motor Vehicle Trade Union under the Korean Motor Vehicle Trade Union Federation affiliated with the Korean Motor Vehicle Trade Union Federation (hereinafter “former Motor Vehicle Union”).
2) The bus companies in the former North Korea including the Defendant (hereinafter collectively referred to as “busing companies”) concluded a collective agreement with the former North Korean Automobile Management around June 2010, with the bus companies in the former North Korea including the Defendant.
3) Since then, some of workers belonging to bus companies entered into the instant Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act (hereinafter “Trade Union Act”), and the instant Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act (hereinafter “Trade Union Act”) continuously demanded collective bargaining since around that time to conclude a collective agreement with bus companies. However, bus companies had already been in existence, and thus, the instant Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act (hereinafter “Trade Union Act”).
The collective bargaining was refused on the ground that it constitutes multiple labor unions prohibited by this Act.
Accordingly, the Trade Union of this case filed an application for dispute mediation with the Jeonbuk Regional Labor Relations Commission, and its members.