구상금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 29,644,622 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 15% per annum from April 23, 2013 to April 28, 2015, and the following.
1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;
2. As to the Defendant’s assertion, the Defendant asserted that the Defendant could not repay the loans properly due to the abolition of individual rehabilitation procedures due to the fraud and delayed payment of wages by the partners, but, on June 24, 2016, Suwon District Court Decision 2016Da66593, supra, filed an application for individual rehabilitation again.
On the other hand, the plaintiff's claim is accepted because the mere application for individual rehabilitation does not affect the progress of the lawsuit in this case.