However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Victim C (E, 45 years old) was employed by the president of the third floor of the D Building in Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Gyeyang-gu, Seoul, and the defendant at the above main point.

1. On January 22, 2016, the Defendant: (a) out of 200,000 won in cash owned by the victim who was in his/her seat in the crepane in a crepane where there is no victim at the crepane station;

In the same day, at the point of Y8:10 on the same day, the Defendant entered the cash card owned by the victim in the cash payment machine and entered the password of the victim who was aware of it in the ordinary sense, at the point of the Yeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, U.S., Seoyang-gu, U.S., and then withdrawn KRW 4,00,000 in cash.

As a result, the Defendant stolen the victim C’s cash of KRW 200,000 and cash of KRW 4,000,000 in the cash withdrawal period owned by the Agricultural Cooperative.

2. On January 22, 2016, the Defendant, such as a computer, entered a cash card owned by the victim in the cash payment machine, which is an information processing unit, such as the computer, at the location of the Yeyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-gu, Daegu District Office located in Yeyang-gu, Daegu District, and then transferred KRW 6,870,000 to the Defendant’s new bank account (Account Number F).

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property benefits by inputting information without authority into a computer or any other information processing device.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to C;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (a point of view), Article 347-2 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for each type of crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of the recommended punishment in the sentencing guidelines] The mitigated area (not more than KRW 100,00,00,000) is a majority of the mitigated areas (not more than KRW 100,00,000).