Around 01:20 on January 16, 2020, the Defendant, at the front of the window B of Changwon-si, expressed that “the Defendant would damage property and enjoy the right on the road” on the front of the window B of Changwon-si, who was dispatched after being reported by 112, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the Defendant “the Defendant shall not have any flasp sp spice spice spice spice, spice spice, and spare spice spice spice spice spice spice spices, and spare spice spice spice spice spice sphersp

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the investigation and maintenance of order of the above D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement to D and E, F statement;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of report on internal investigation and investigation;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Penalty surcharge of KRW 4,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. It is necessary to strictly cope with crimes of obstruction of performance of official duties on the grounds of sentencing Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code.

However, the defendant was unable to know about the police's returning home in the state of prosperity at the time, and therefore, the defendant seems not to have neglected public power or resisted it.

The degree of violence is relatively relatively less severe, and one million won was deposited in compensation for damage.

In particular, the defendant is a primary offender with no criminal records, and the defendant has made a deep reflect on the fact that he caused the instant case while taking the employment examination and subsequently improved drinking habits by holding a meeting. Therefore, the sentence of a fine shall be suspended because it is deemed that his dogmatic spirit is remarkable.