2. Although the Defendant is led to confession and reflect by the judgment, considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was punished several times due to the same type of crime and the same type of crime; (b) the Defendant administered the instant penphone during the period of the same repeated crime; and (c) inhales marijuana; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (b) other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.