When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle to be examined B.

On November 2, 2015, at around 05:25, the Defendant moved right at a speed of about 30 kilometers in speed, from the west-gu, Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, to the intersection distance from the west-gu to the intersection, using the two-lane speed from the west-gu.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to take care of the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the pedestrian.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected it, and got a victim C (46 Does, south) who dried the crosswalk located on the right side of the course of the course of the course according to pedestrian signals and was placed on the left side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, due to the above occupational negligence, the defendant suffered injury that requires stability and medical treatment for about 8 weeks due to the victim's marization of the part of the representative, the fluoral fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a statement of actual investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes by adding a report on investigation (the medical certificate, the source of proof of subscription to automobile insurance);

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2) and Article 3(2)6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;