beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.03.25 2014고단8384

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 13:20 on June 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) changed the lane to four lanes to enter the riverside North Korea while proceeding three lanes from the East-ro, Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, to enter the road of 199 East-ro, Seongdong-gu; (b) the Defendant stopped the vehicle from one another on the ground that the victim C, who followed himself, was able to walk up to the riverside North Korea; and (c) the victim, who stopped the vehicle at one time, and had a verbal dispute with the victim, took a desire to “The Republic of Korea, China, and Rural Affairs, I am I am I am, I am I am I am I am, I am I am I am I am, I am I am I am I am, I am I am I am I am I am I am, I am am am on the face of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first trial record;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on death diagnosis, injury photograph;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [Scope of Recommendation] General Injury [No person who is a special person] [Decision of sentence] / [Decision of sentence] The crime of this case, such as taking a bath first to the victim and assaulting the victim even though the defendant has prevented three-lanes, it is not considerably good that the crime of this case is committed, such as taking a bath first to the victim and assaulting the victim. The victim's damage was not agreed with the victim. Nevertheless, it is not possible to agree with the victim. On the other hand, the defendant was the first offender, and the victim deposited KRW 3 million for the victim.