건물철거등
1. The defendant shall display 19, 20, 39, 38, and 19 of the annexed drawings on the ground of the real estate stated in attached Table 1 of the attached list to the plaintiff.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On August 2002, the Defendant leased the instant store owned by the Plaintiff from the Plaintiff at KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 600,000,000,000 for lease deposit, and constructed household buildings, such as warehouses, such as (a), (b), (e), and (f) parts of the attached drawings (hereinafter “the instant household buildings”) on the site, and operated a joint pole with the name of “C Seokdong, Inc.”
B. On May 3, 2011, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the Plaintiff, which provides that KRW 700,000 per month for the instant store (excluding value-added tax) and the period from May 3, 201 to May 31, 2013, and concluded a special agreement to remove the instant provisional building built by the Defendant until October 30, 201.
C. As the above lease term expires, the original Defendant agreed to increase the rent of the instant store from July 2013 to KRW 1 million per month (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”), and the Defendant paid the Plaintiff the rent increased to the Plaintiff.
After September 16, 2013, on October 16, 2013, the head of the strengthened Eup notified the Plaintiff of the restoration order that the enforcement fine will be imposed if the building of this case was not voluntarily removed without the building report, and the Plaintiff, at the latest, removed the building of this case by October 20, 2013, “The Defendant removed the building of this case by not later than October 20, 2013,” and signed and sealed by the Defendant.
[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 3, 5, 6-1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the result of the survey and appraisal conducted by appraiser D, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The parties' assertion
A. The plaintiff: The plaintiff terminates the lease contract of this case due to the defendant's failure to perform the terms of the contract.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to remove the instant building from the Plaintiff and deliver this part of the building site and the instant store to the Plaintiff.
B. Defendant: The Defendant removed part of the building of this case and used the remainder inevitably for business purpose.