입찰참가자격제한처분취소
1. The Defendant’s disposition of restricting participation in bidding for three months against the Plaintiff on August 4, 2015 is revoked.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
On October 22, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into the instant contract with the Defendant to enter into a detailed design and initial construction contract for the structure of the tea structure (hereinafter “instant contract”) and contracted the manufacturing of the products under the instant contract to the subcontractor (i) 1, 2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 1, 1, 4, 2, 2, 3, 4, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 2, 3, and 4, the product of this case (hereinafter “instant products”).
On January 9, 2012, the Plaintiff contracted the production of lighting fixtures to Crops, a collaborative company. On January 9, 2012, the Defendant’s quality guarantee agency (hereinafter “Crops”) requested the quality verification test of the water produced in Crops. On January 13, 2012, the Plaintiff was ordered to submit the test report of an authorized institution with respect to the water quality of water produced in Crops.
Croscis issued two test reports from the Busan Metropolitan City Health and Environment Research Institute on January 30, 2012, to the effect that the samples collected from the croscopter are found to meet the water quality standards for drinking water, but they submitted to the Plaintiff by altering the content of “scopic residuess meet the water quality standards for drinking water due to non-explicing and non-explosion” (hereinafter “test report”) and the Plaintiff submitted the modified test report on March 23, 2012 as they were.
The plaintiff related to the Dokket Co., Ltd. contracted the manufacturing of the Dokket, which is a partner company, to the comparison industry.