손해배상(기)
1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as follows, except for correction, addition, or modification as follows, among the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The parts corrected, added, or modified;
A. Grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance
D. (3) To the fourth sentence of paragraph (3), the phrase “the end of this case” shall be corrected to read “the end of this case” (hereinafter referred to as “the end of this case”).
B. Grounds for the judgment of the first instance court No. 2.
F. (3) The fifth part of paragraph (3) is to change the phrase “a measure of cutting electricity and water of this case by the above resolution” to the phrase “a measure of cutting electricity and water of this case by the above resolution on May 11, 2015.”
C. Grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance
(b)(1)At the end of paragraph (1), the following shall be added:
The defendant asserts that Article 11 of the Building Management Regulations provides that "the measures for cutting electricity and water of this case shall not be unlawful even if it did not go through prior resolution of the Representative Committee of the Management Body, since Article 11 of the Building Management Regulations provides that "the measures for cutting electricity and water of this case shall not be taken in accordance with the Building Management Regulations, or shall be taken immediately
If the purport of the entire argument is added to the statement No. 15-1 of evidence No. 15, Article 3(1) of the Building Management Regulations provides that if the contents of the Building Management Regulations conflict with those of the Management Rules, the contents of the Management Rules shall prevail. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. Grounds for the judgment of the first instance court
C. (1) The second part of the second part of paragraph (1) states that “The Plaintiff asserts that the business loss was 39,619,637 won,” “The Plaintiff asserts that the business loss was 31,240,015 won.”
3. The plaintiff's claim is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed.