beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.01.09 2017가합45663

사해행위취소

Text

1.(a)

On October 4, 2016, Defendant C Co., Ltd and D with respect to the claims listed in paragraph (3) of the attached Table.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff, including the conclusion of a credit guarantee agreement, omits the name of “stock company” in the name of the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “F Co., Ltd.”) on April 25, 201, 201, when it refers to a bank (hereinafter referred to as “bank”) on the first guarantee number guarantee date (the guarantee period) as indicated in the following table (hereinafter “instant credit guarantee agreement”).

) Loans 1,425,00,000 G 2 G on May 4, 2016 (see, e.g., May 2, 2017) L Co., Ltd. 84,000 J loans 784,000,000 on August 26, 2016 (see, e.g., August 25, 2017) and L Co., Ltd. 80,000 commercial security 80,000,0005 MM on June 16, 2016 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 70,000,0000,0000 NA loans for commercial transactions on July 15, 2016 (see, e.g., July 14, 2017); 10,0000O-60, Jul. 10, 2015).

B. The Plaintiff’s acquisition of indemnity bonds, etc. 1) Nonparty Company was issued a credit guarantee certificate from the Plaintiff pursuant to the instant credit guarantee agreement and received a loan or supplied goods from the principal. Nonparty Company 2, 2, 36, 353, 136, 764, 157, 129, 017, 293 H 2, 12,00,000, 910, 7910, 7913 J. 2, 2017, 207, 278, 367, 278, 207, 207, 367, 278, 207, 206, 367, 278, 207, 2, 367, 207, 376, 379, 975, 379, 476, 378, 2784, 287

(2) The Plaintiff’s claim for indemnity arising from the said subrogation (hereinafter “instant claim for indemnity”). The amount of damages for final delay arising from the said subrogation by the third Plaintiff is KRW 80,216.

Then, the plaintiff was from the non-party company 8,590.