[Criminal Records] The case: The Seoul Northern District Court's decision that interfered with the business of sentencing on October 30, 2014: One year of imprisonment and a fine of 300,000 won (one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for deliberation and a fine of 600,000 won is mitigated at the appellate court): April 1, 2015; the termination of the execution of sentence in the original prison / [criminal facts] around August 10, 2016; the defendant was under the influence of alcohol at the Health Insurance Corporation office located in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, 310 Do Office on August 11 and 30, 2016; and whether the insurance premium has been so big.

It is explained that the victim B is due to the insurance premium in arrears, and whether it is a document that was made on the old day, i.e., e., e., f., e., g., old day, d. d., d.

The victim interfered with the victim’s duty of civil petition consultation by force by avoiding the disturbance, such as putting the book of the counseling counter at hand and putting the bath, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of B’s written laws and regulations;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime and Article 314 (1) of the same Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. A person whose sentencing under Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes is limited to one of the special sentencing guidelines between January and August 1 through June 1, and from June 1 to June 3: A mitigation factor (unlimited to punishment), a aggravation factor (referring to the same type repeated offense): A general sentencing factor in the basic area (from June to June 1): A sentence imposed in October: A person who has been sentenced to an aggravated punishment for 6 months: A person who has been sentenced to an aggravated punishment for 6 months: A person who has been sentenced to an aggravated punishment for a repeated offense (same type), a person who has been subject to a mitigated punishment for a victim, a person who has been unable to punish the victim, a treatment of the principal offender, and a need for assistance, etc.;