Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is erroneous and adversely affected by the judgment.

2. The judgment of this case is that, while the high school student of this case purchased tobacco at a tobacco shop and walked along with her friendly f, F et al., F et al. took place during the course of assault, 112 report I to the police as a crime of assault, and that F et al. was revealed in the process of investigating the place where tobacco was purchased at the police and questioning where where F et al. (Evidence No. 33,43,44 of the record) was located (Evidence No. 33, 43, 44 of the record). I stated that "F et al. seen as a student" in the investigative agency used tobacco as a fry with other juveniles waiting in the front, and sent the tobacco to F et al. (Evidence No. 33,46 of the record, F and F at the time and time, and f. 8 of the record of the facts charged, the court below's statement to the effect that "F. 2 of the evidence purchased" was legitimate, and its credibility and f.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just, and there is no error of misconception of facts.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.