When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On October 25, 2017, the Defendant heard the assistant principal of the pertinent school E and five teachers in the Gyeonggi-si Office located in the Gyeonggi-si Office where the Victim B works for the victim B, who was skid around 13:00 on October 25, 2017.

h. anywhere is difficult

열쇠를 가지고 총각 집에 가서 쉬다가 온다는 게 말이 돼 ”, “B 이 얌전한 줄 알고들 있죠

“.......” and “............”

“The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out facts, such as the large interest.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of E, H, I, and J;

1. The respective legal statements of B and K in part;

1. Each statement of E, H, I, and J;

1. A request for cooperation (53 pages of investigation records) (the defendant and defense counsel asserted that the defendant and defense counsel only met the fact that they visited the principal of the D school room on the date and time set by the defendant's decision and asked whether they are F in front of the school room, and that they did not speak the victim's reputation in the school room as stated in its reasoning.

The summary of each of the legal statements made by the Dop, witness E, H, I, and J is as follows: “Around the date and time of the ruling, the Defendant was removed from E by entering the school room, and the Defendant was removed from E by entering the school room and finding F as stated in its reasoning,” and the summary of the case was consistent with the major parts, such as the background of the case, the Defendant’s behavior, and the response of the students who were in the school department of D at the time of the Defendant’s action, and the head of D school.

K In addition, in this Court, “the defendant found in the school room on the day of the ruling, told the school room of B and F, and the defendant went to the school room after having come to the school room after having come to hold an interview with the school room.” However, K did not have any higher character in the school room, and it did not hear the sound referred to in the school room after the defendant went to the school room.”

There is no inconsistency with the other witnesses' statements concerning the circumstances of the case.

The defendant.