1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have found the Defendant guilty of both the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (e.g., minor, deceptive scheme, etc. under the age of 13) and the violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (excluding the part of innocence for the first instance trial) among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience

2. As to the case of the request for attachment order, the Defendant and the respondent for the attachment order filed a final appeal with respect to the case of the request for attachment order, but the appellate brief does not contain any indication of the grounds for appeal and does not contain any description of the grounds for appeal regarding this part

3. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.