Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

At around 17:00 on August 26, 2019, the Defendant: (a) visited the victim at a certain place to find E, a divorced Defendant’s spouse; (b) visited the victim, “E” on the fourth floor of the Jeju Building, “D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D D with an objection to the victim, and obstructed the victim’s operation of the church for ten minutes by force.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the defendant in this court;

1. Statement of the suspect interrogation protocol on the accused prepared by the police;

1. A written statement prepared B;

1. Entry of each 112 Reporting Case Handling List in police preparation; and

1. Application of each of the related visual Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 【The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order 【The scope of applicable sentences 50,000 won to a fine of 15 million won: The fact that there are many records that the defendant was punished for violent crimes and obstruction of business; circumstances favorable to the defendant that the defendant was unable to get used from the victim: The defendant generally recognized his mistake and divided it; the degree of damage caused by the instant crime is minor; and the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime.