The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and convicted the Defendants without deceiving the victims of the mistake of facts.

The sentence (Defendant A: a fine of 10,000,000 won, Defendant B: a fine of 7,000,000 won) declared by the lower court of unreasonable sentencing is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The lower court’s judgment on the assertion of mistake was duly adopted and examined as follows: ① The owner of the first floor No. 102 (hereinafter “instant house No. 102”) No. 1034m2 (hereinafter “No. 102”) of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, the Defendants sold to the Defendant at the time of August 18, 2010, who was the victim paid KRW 30 million to the Defendant; ② the owner of the said F334m2, who was the site thereof; ② the NN Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N”) with the Defendants as the co-representative of the joint representative on April 22, 2010, the lower court was sentenced to the Seoul High Court’s judgment 201m2 (hereinafter “NN”) on the ground that the construction work price was revoked, including the instant house No. 102, which became final and conclusive on the ground that it was not sufficient to obtain the said judgment from the Seoul High Court. However, the lower court’s judgment 201m27.