beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.07.26 2019고정1331

도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 25, 2019, at around 12:05, the Defendant: (a) driven a D Poter freight vehicle from the front distance of the C Care Center located in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, to the F-section located in E in the operational area; (b) was negligent in the course of duties, due to negligence in neglecting the duty of all-round care care in the operation area; (c) was shocked to the front part of the victim G driving of the Haststy Haol-si, who carried the front part of the right-hand part of the Hast Haa-si, which was directly carried on the F-section from the steering area to the F-section in the operation area; and (d) was damaged to the left-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle to repair the damaged vehicle without immediately stopping the vehicle and continue driving the vehicle without taking necessary measures at the time of the occurrence of the traffic accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A report on internal investigation and a report on internal investigation (fore, a photo of a damaged vehicle);

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Crimes and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the former Road Traffic Act (Amended by Act No. 15530, Mar. 27, 2018);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the reason for sentencing, is that the Defendant, as stated in its reasoning, has driven away from the scene while causing damage due to a contact accident and has left the scene, but has stopped at the end of the harming vehicle, and thus, the relevant criminal liability is not weak.

However, the defendant shows an attitude to recognize and reflect the crime of this case, and the insurance that the defendant has bought with respect to the vehicle driven by the defendant seems to have been restored to a considerable amount of damage.

The defendant has no record of criminal punishment except for those subject to a fine of 50,000 won due to the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, 2016.

In addition, the arguments and records of this case, such as the defendant's age and behavior environment, relationship with the victim, motive means and results of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.