At around 20:49 on June 24, 2012, the Defendant assaulted the victim D at one time as drinking the head of the victim D, on the ground that: (a) the Defendant’s house of Heungdong 109 Dong 1905, 1905, while drinking alcohol together with the above C, said C was sleeped to “I am? as he thought,” and (b) the said C was put on drinking to the said C; and (c) said C was slicked to “I am? I am? I am? I am me am?”

B. At the same time, time, and place as mentioned in the above paragraph (1) above, the Defendant assaulted the victim C by stating that the victim C is “if she is about why she would d' or not,” and that the victim C is in accordance with the said D and the victim C, who was satisfeed in B, in accordance with the Gai Victim C, and was satched by the victim C, and the victim C’s head debt, and took satfes and satisfes.

2. Each of the above facts charged is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the records, it is recognized that the victim C and D submitted a written agreement on March 15, 2013, which was after the prosecution of this case, and expressed their intent not to be punished against the defendant. Thus, all of the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.