However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant who forged a private document may borrow from “C” located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul on April 2010, hereinafter the said amount to be paid up until August 25, 2010, with the following amounts borrowed. The monthly interest rate will be the same.

If the principal is unable to repay, the guarantor: D: resident registration number of D: E: Address of Songpa-gu Fa-903, 105-903: G’ and kept in custody of the said D name after stating that “I are responsible for and repaid by the guarantor.”

D his seal has been affixed.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a copy of cash loan certificate in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. In the event of the above investigation document, the Defendant exercised the said cash loan certificate to H, a creditor of the Defendant, who was aware of the forged facts, as described in the above 1.1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. To describe a certificate of cash borrowing and apply the existing Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document) and Article 234 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above-mentioned document) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more;