부당이득금반환
1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part regarding Plaintiff B’s Defendant D and E was terminated as the withdrawal of the lawsuit on October 6, 2014.
2...
1. According to the records on the Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant D and E, Plaintiff B did not appear even after being served on the first day of May 30, 2014 open on the first day of pleading and the fourth day of pleading opened on September 5, 2014. Defendant D and E did not appear even after being served on each of the above dates of pleading, and Defendant D and E did not appear on each of the said dates of pleading, and did not file an application for designation of the date for one month thereafter (In addition, Plaintiff B did not appear on the fifth day of pleading opened on September 26, 2014, the fifth day of pleading opened on October 10, 2014, and the sixth day of pleading opened on October 10, 2014) of the instant lawsuit, the portion of Plaintiff B’s Defendant D and the portion on E was withdrawn on October 6, 2014 from the fourth day of pleading under Article 268(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Determination as to the claims filed by the plaintiff A and C against the defendant D and E
A. The facts of recognition are as follows: (a) Plaintiff A and B are married couple; (b) Plaintiff C are children; (c) Defendant D is employed from February 4, 2010 to December 2010 at the restaurant operated by Plaintiff A and B; (d) Defendant E is a person who was the husband of Defendant D; and (e) Defendant F is a father of Defendant D (Defendant E does not have blood relationship with Defendant E).
is the same.