A Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and for a defendant B, for two years, respectively.

To the extent that it does not substantially disadvantage the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, the following facts charged shall be organized and criminal facts shall be recognized:

The Defendants and their names influence (E) drafted a false lease agreement stating that “Defendant A has a claim for a deposit of KRW 297 million against Defendant AF,” the Defendants submitted the above lease agreement signed by Defendant A to a financial institution to offer a false lease deposit to the financial institution as security, thereby receiving a loan from the financial institution, and Defendant B conspired to withdraw the above remittance from cash and divide it into two.

1. Defendant A’s event of the above investigation document at the 11:40 on July 23, 2014, at the 137-7 intersection building first floor of the Do Government-dong 137-7 school building, Defendant A’s “E” in the form of a “real estate lease agreement” in the “real estate lease agreement” at a non-regular location of the date “E”. Defendant A around June 16, 2014, to the lessor F on June 16, 2014, the same year.

7. The remainder of around 16.16. The lease deposit amounting to KRW 297 billion is paid, and the "3403,000,000,000,000,000 is deemed to be a clerical error in the Namyang-do apartment 3404, which is written in the indictment of 3404, Namyang-do.

After stating that the term “to lease 703” was “to lease 703,” each of the F and A’s respective private documents relating to rights and obligations forged by affixing the name of F and A’s seal, one copy of the “real estate lease agreement” was presented to H, who is an employee of the said teaching and life insurance company, as if they were genuine.

2. Defendant A’s joint crime committed by the Defendants is genuine to Defendant A, at the time and place specified in the above paragraph 1, one copy of the forged real estate lease agreement as stated in the above paragraph 1, and H, who is an employee of the victim school life insurance company, not aware of such fact.