beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.10.08 2015고단1716

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a D white-clock.

On March 8, 2015, the Defendant driven the above truck and driven a point of 188.7 km located in Gyeongcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, Kim Jong-si along three-lanes from the Gu and Gyeongcheon-si to Kimcheon-si, the Defendant left the center separation zone set up on the left side of the above truck in the direction of progress due to occupational negligence, which neglected to perform the duty of e-mail and failed to properly operate steering devices and brakes. On March 22 and 30, 2015, the Defendant driven the above truck and driven the above truck on the road of the same direction. Accordingly, the Defendant stopped the e-mail test of the victim E-(46 years old) driving on the two-lane in the same direction, resulting in the victim's separation from the middle part of the cement structure and the rear part of the cement structure. The Defendant followed the two-lane white vehicle from the middle part of the cement structure.

Ultimately, as seen above, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E by occupational negligence during approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time caused a traffic accident where the drivers of the above victims and the central separation cost were damaged, and went away from the scene without taking any measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness K and L;

1. Each statement of E, G, and I;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. A written diagnosis (E) and written estimate for each item;

1. In light of the background, etc. of the accident of this case, it is recognized that the defendant neglected his duty of care on the front left left, failed to properly operate the steering gear and brakes, and that the defendant was not at fault.