Text

1. The Defendant received KRW 220,000,000 from the Plaintiff simultaneously with the Plaintiff’s payment:

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff, who is an indicated housing reconstruction improvement project association, urged the Defendant, who did not agree with the resolution of the reconstruction project, to reply to whether to participate in the reconstruction in accordance with the resolution by the delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case, and requested the Defendant to return a claim for sale under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents if he did not reply within two months from the date of receipt of the copy of the complaint of this case. The Defendant failed to reply within two months from the date of receipt of the copy of the complaint of this case, and on November 1, 2017, on which two months have passed after the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint against the Defendant as to the real estate listed in the attached list owned by the Defendant, and on the ground that the sales contract was established at the market price based on appraisal of the purchase price, the registration of conditional ownership of the real estate subject to redemption of the purchase price