업무상과실치상
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendant
A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months, and by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.
except that this shall not apply.
1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is as follows: Each sentence of the lower court (one year of suspended execution in April of the credit cooperative; one year of suspended execution in June of the credit cooperative); and one year of suspended execution in June of the credit cooperative) is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the defendants is in conflict with the confession of the crime of this case, and the defendant A deposited the victimsJ as a person who was the principal of the victims in order to recover from damage, and deposited the victims L with KRW 12 million, KRW 5 million, and KRW 3 million to the victims K respectively, and the victim J and the victim J paid part of the medical expenses for L, and the defendant B deposited the victims with the victim J as a person who was the principal of the victim for the recovery of damage, KRW 3 million to the victim J, KRW 1 million to the victim L, and KRW 1 million to the victim K, and the defendants deposited the victims with the victim K without any criminal record exceeding the same kind of crime.
However, in this case, Defendant B, an architectural tegrative fishery operator, did not perform construction of the lag and lower part of the roads, etc. while constructing a lag, but did not properly construct the lag. Defendant A, an operator of the lag resort, provided the above lag bank to accommodation visitors, and violated his duty of care, such as using waste materials causing harmful gas due to fire reduction used at heating, etc., and the crime is not good, and the crime is not good; the victim L among three victims complained of the lag decrease in lag ability; the victim J complained of the decrease in lag; the victim J did not have the nature of intelligence, and it appears that the result was serious to the extent that it would be difficult to expect a normal life due to the lack of lag, etc.; the Defendants appears to go beyond their responsibilities to the victims; and the victims’ family members appears not to have properly recovered damage; and the victims’ family members were disadvantageous to the Defendants.
Other circumstances, including the above circumstances.