A shall be punished by imprisonment of 10 months, and by a fine of 1.5 million won, respectively.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Defendant

A is the owner of D's business in the second floor of the Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Cheongju-si, and the defendant B is an employee who considers the carter at the above business establishment.

1. From January 2019 to August 8, 2019, the Defendants provided eight marina rooms at the above establishment from around August 8, 2019 to receive KRW 110,00 in return for sexual traffic from male customers who employ Chinese women, such as E and F, and receive 10,000 won in return for sexual traffic, and led them to sexual intercourses with male guests or to perform similar acts.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

2. No person violating the Immigration Control Act shall employ any person who is not qualified to sojourn; and

A. The Defendants conspired to act from July 15, 2019 to the same year.

8. By August 8, 200, E entered the said establishment as exemption from the visa for tourism purposes was employed as an employee of the said establishment.

B. The Defendants conspired with each other from July 30, 2019 to the same year.

8. Until August 8, F entered the said establishment as an employee of the said establishment by way of exemption from the purpose visa for mine mine use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol concerning E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, leaflets, sales slips, certificates of completion, certificates of qualification, real estate lease contracts, reports on respective immigration offenders, and immigration status of individuals;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, subparagraph 9 of Article 94 and Article 18 (3) of the Immigration Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. The choice of the defendant A, who has been punished by imprisonment, and the fine, against the defendant B

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of each Criminal Act (within the scope of the sum of the maximum punishment and maximum amount for each crime);

1. The Criminal Act (Defendant B) shall apply to the detention in a workhouse;