성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment for six months, suspension of execution for two years, community service, 80 hours, and order to attend a sexual assault treatment lecture) of the lower court is too unreasonable;
2. Determination
A. It is recognized that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, and that the victims do not want the punishment of the defendant under an agreement with I, E, J, K, L, and M among the victims, and that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime.
B. However, the defendant continuously and repeatedly displayed the victim's body and body against the victim's will, as well as the photographs taken by the defendant on the bulletin board of the Internet site with high radio waveability. In full view of the fact that the nature of the crime was very poor, that the majority of victims did not agree, that there was no special change in circumstances after the decision of the court below was made, and that there was no other change in circumstances after the decision of the court below was made, and that there were other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as stated in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable even if the circumstances favorable to the defendant as seen earlier are considered.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.