2. It is recognized that the Defendants recognized the crime of this case, Defendant A was the primary offender, and Defendant A was two foreigners who illegally employed and were exposed to a period of employment.

However, the crime of this case is employing a person who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment, and there is a risk that deprivation of employment opportunities for Koreans and foreigners staying in the Republic of Korea may disrupt the management of foreigners staying in the Republic of Korea, and mass production of many illegal aliens, and the nature of the crime is not negligible, it is necessary to maintain equality with criminal punishment for the crime similar to the crime of this case, and in full view of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, including the motive and circumstances leading to the crime of this case and the circumstances before and after the crime, even though considering the circumstances cited in the grounds for appeal, the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendants' above assertion is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.