beta
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2016.05.13 2014가합2405

소유권이전등기 등

Text

1. Defendant B, C, and E are each corresponding money indicated by the Plaintiff on the “sale price” list of the details of the execution of the attached sales contract.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction project partnership established to implement a housing reconstruction project (hereinafter “instant project”) in the area of 29,995 square meters in the Gu-Si, Gu-si. The Defendants are owners of each of the pertinent real estate (hereinafter “each of the instant apartment buildings”) indicated in the detailed statement of the execution of the attached Table 1 sales contract located within the instant project zone.

B. On July 17, 2014 and July 31, 2014, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendants a written peremptory notice to the effect that, within two months, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendants, pursuant to Article 39 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) and Article 48 of the Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings (hereinafter “Act on the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Buildings”), the Plaintiff sent a written peremptory notice to the effect that, within two months,

Defendant C received all the above peremptory notices on July 21, 2014 and August 4, 2014; Defendant D and the Korea Land and Housing Corporation respectively on July 18, 2014 and August 1, 2014; however, the peremptory notices on Defendant B did not reach the absence of closure.

C. In filing the instant lawsuit, the Plaintiff notified the Defendants of whether they agreed to the establishment of the Plaintiff’s association, and stated the intent to exercise the right to demand sale, and attached a written peremptory notice in writing.

The duplicate of the instant complaint was served on Defendant B on November 20, 2014.

Defendant B, C, and D did not answer whether they agree to the establishment of the Plaintiff Union until two months have passed since the receipt of the above written peremptory notice and the duplicate of the instant complaint.

around July 24, 2014, the Korea Land and Housing Corporation of the defendant is the plaintiff, and the apartment house owned by the defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation of 405 Dong 202 is the apartment house.

) On October 12, 1990, G responded to the purport that it is impossible to respond to the consent to the establishment of the Plaintiff Union for reasons such as purchase by G.