1. On October 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 7, 2018, at E located in Seocheon-si D, the Defendant: (b) “B used the credit card for the daily living expenses of Eul, including F and G, which participated in A’s funeral ceremony; and (c) “B makes it possible to me to see that he/she was dead, she would have been able to do so until he/she was found inside her; and (d) “B makes it possible to us to do so; and (c) there is a reason why C in Indonesia, who is located in B, for 10 years, would be able to arrange for remaining her own food and drink in Indonesia for the purpose of using it.”

However, the victim did not use C's credit card arbitrarily and did not know that C died, and there was no fact that C intended to use C's scam or business operator.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Around October 27, 2018, the Defendant stated that “C brings to B one of the other things while entering the Obacs, Bacs, and Bacs in which C was located in the territory of F and H at the house where C was living in Indonesia.”

In fact, however, there was no fact that the victim did not bring about the Oralba or Bangladesh owned by C.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

2. A written opinion prepared by the judgment investigative agency, a criminal investigation report (person G telephone conversations for reference) and a professional statement in the investigation results report are inadmissible as the defendant did not consent to use it as evidence, and conform to the facts charged.