A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Defendant

A was a person who took beauty classes from July 2018 to January 2019 from the victim C (n, 30 years of age). Defendant B was the spouse of Defendant A, and Defendant A demanded the victim to refund 5.8 million won of tuition fees without any particular reason, and even if the victim had already received 1.93 million won of tuition fees from the victim around January 30, 2019, the Defendants continued to demand the victim to refund the remaining tuition fees.

1. On February 28, 2019, Defendant A sent the Kakao Stockholm message to the effect that the victim demand the return of the amount of tuition fees as above at the Kakao Stockholm message to the effect that the victim should return the said amount of tuition fees as above, Defendant threatened the victim by sending the victim the Kakao Stockholm message stating, “If forgotten is forgotten, one time until the time and end of the report would be less difficult to make certain items of a short time.”

2. Defendant B

A. On March 20, 2019, the Defendant threatened the victim on the ground that the victim refused to refund the amount of the A’s tuition fees at a place in which it was located at around 16:07 on March 20, 2019, the Defendant sent the Defendant a Kakao Stockholm message, “The victim closed down the Kakao Kao Kao Park that caused many frauds at the end of the A’s lecture machines and materials, married from 1st century to 1stma, and coming to marriage from 2000 to 200.”

B. On April 15, 2019, the Defendant sent the Kakao Stockholm message to the victim for the same reasons as in the preceding paragraph at around 17:30 on April 15, 2019, on the ground that the Defendant expressed that the victim would find the cosmetic venue in which the victim participated as an examiner and would have the victim faced with the victim, and that the victim would go against the victim, and then the victim threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. C.