However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

No one shall engage in business of exchanging tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

The Defendants: (a) around April 6, 2017, at the Namyang-si, E and 503 (“F”); (b) Defendant A, as a business owner, entrusted the operation of the said game site; (c) Defendant B and Defendant C, as an employee, entrusted the management and exchange work of the game site; and (d) customers were in charge of the said game site management and exchange work; (c) they exchanged the remaining game points by calculating 10% of commission, excluding commission fees, upon the request that they exchange the game points acquired after they conducted the game using 70 games set up in the said game site.

As a result, Defendants conspired to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of G to the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to H (tentative name) and I;

1. Registers of the game industry registration;

1. On-site photographs and closure photographs of a dynamic image;

1. Application of each statute of the existing Acts and subordinate statutes of No. 4, No. 7, No. 1000, No. 1000, No. 1000

1. The Defendants of the relevant criminal facts: Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the former Game Industry Promotion Act (Amended by Act No. 14424, Dec. 20, 2016); Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A who is selected to be sentenced to imprisonment: Defendant B and C who is selected to be sentenced to a fine;

1. Defendant B, and C: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act, respectively;

1. Defendant A who is subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Protective observation and community service order Defendant A: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 44 (2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act;

1. Defendant B and C: Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The criminal liability against Defendant A in light of the details, contents, etc. of the instant crime.

However, the defendant himself.