beta
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2015.09.17 2015가합200575

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant: 3,500,000 won to the Plaintiff, and 6% per annum from November 4, 2014 to September 17, 2015, and the next day.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On March 8, 2014, the Plaintiff purchased 60,200,000 Mazz E200 Motor Vehicle (hereinafter “instant motor vehicle”) from the Defendant and operated it on delivery.

On June 20, 2014, at the Defendant’s subcommittee services center for the party branch of the instant vehicle, the Plaintiff adjusted the reduction of the front and rear conference of the instant vehicle and was improved due to the occurrence of noise caused by the sudden operation of the instant vehicle, and subsequently, there was a problem, such as: (a) the instant vehicle maintenance warning message was broken and the instrument was cut off.

(B) On September 9, 2014, the Plaintiff and his spouse, operated the instant vehicle as the instant vehicle with a speed of about 80 km, and the instant vehicle was in a situation that makes it impossible to operate normally, such as the Plaintiff’s vehicle plate and hand-on, etc., while driving the vehicle as the instant vehicle with a speed of about 80 km, and the instant vehicle was immediately stopped on the side, but thereafter, the instant accident occurred (hereinafter “instant accident”).

피고가 이 사건 사고 원인을 조사한 결과, 이 사건 자동차의 에어컨의 응축수 배출 호스가 제대로 연결되어 있지 않아 조수석 측 발판 밑 일부 바닥의 움푹 들어가 있는 부분에 고일 정도로 물이 새었고, 위와 같이 새어나온 수분이 자동차 네트워크 통신과 관련되어 있는 분배기를 오작동하게 한 것으로 나타났는바(이하 ‘이 사건 침수하자’라 한다), 피고는 2014. 9. 12. 이 사건 자동차 조수석 바닥에 고인 수분을 제거하고 분배기를 교체하여 이 사건 자동차 정비를 완료하였다.

From August 3, 2015, the Plaintiff received from B, from B, the instant accident against the Defendant and the claim for consolation money due to the balance sheet of the instant vehicle, and B on August 7, 2015.